Systematic Investing: Look Beyond the Largest Stocks
It’s easy for concentration risks to find their way into equity portfolios. That’s where our Systematic Core Equity team comes in.
Expect the unexpected
Our approach to risk management.
Transcript
John Campbell: Today's markets are complex, and risk can emerge from many angles. This is why we believe relying on just one perspective isn't enough. For us, evaluating risk means building a complete picture. Without research, it's nearly impossible to understand the risks involved in investing. That's why the Systematic Core team blends our advanced quantitative tools with deep, fundamental analysis to gauge the true picture of investment risk. Starting with the bottom left quadrant, when we apply quantitative risk models from the bottom up, we get a clear view of fundamental risks. These risks are typically referred to as common factor or style risks. We use a research-based model to keep our strategies on track. This helps us control how much our results might differ from the market and avoid risks that don't fit with our investment approach. Why? Because if we take on risks that don't align with our strategy, it can water down performance, create surprises, and make it harder to deliver consistent results. Moving to the top left quadrant, we want to be mindful of macroeconomic forces. Think of this as big-picture stuff that can shake up the market. These are forces we can't control but we need to watch closely—things like interest rates, changes in commodity prices, and global trends in yields. Keeping an eye on these helps us understand how broad economic shifts might impact our investments so we can make smarter decisions in a constantly changing world. Quantitative risk models have been foundational to our team's process since the 1990s, providing what we believe is repeatability and consistency. But we also think that relying on these models alone would leave out half the picture. Numbers don't tell the whole story. Some risks are harder to measure or only matter for a short period of time—things like geopolitical tensions, new technologies shaking up an industry, or sudden policy changes. These emerging risks don't always show up in traditional models, but they can have a big impact on markets. That's why we look beyond the data to identify these trends early and adjust when needed. Qualitative analysis applied from the top down helps us stay ahead of the curve, not just react to it. Finally, we dig deeper at the company level to find idiosyncratic risks—unique challenges like lawsuits, regulatory roadblocks, or negative sentiment. Our portfolio managers go beyond traditional models by tapping into diverse sources—news trends, corporate actions, and even unusual price moves. This bottom-up approach gives us a clearer view of company-specific risks and helps us avoid costly surprises. And now, we see the full picture—a multidimensional approach to risk that allows us to navigate complex markets with greater clarity, precision, and confidence. Our risk management approach guides us in seeking companies we believe offer attractive valuations and strong fundamentals. Through this disciplined process, we strive to build portfolios designed to navigate changing market conditions and align with client objectives.
Featured insights
A risk-on rally fueled by AI and earnings strength set the tone, but elevated expectations and macro uncertainty may shape a more volatile path ahead. Allspring’s Head of Systematic Core Equity, John Campbell, recaps second-quarter market performance and highlights the importance of diversification and risk management.
Global equities are a key part of long-term investing. Blending passive and systematic active global equity strategies may help investors efficiently navigate changing market conditions and enhance long-term investment outcomes.
The meme stock craze was a reminder that risk isn’t a static concept. It evolves with global events, technology, and policy changes. Traditional risk metrics are useful, but they often fail to capture thematic risks.
John Campbell reviews Q1 volatility, emphasizing risk management and strategic focus amid uncertainty.
As passive investing dominates market flows, John Campbell, head of Systematic Core Equity at Allspring Global Investments, examines the risks of peak passive concentration and the case for broader diversification.
John Campbell discusses how Allspring’s Systematic Core Equity team’s multidimensional risk framework can help investors manage inevitable volatility and the evolving impact of AI on markets heading into 2026.
Many portfolio managers think like engineers, but it’s rare to find one with a background in nuclear engineering. John Campbell explains how his team fuses systematic and fundamental models to manage U.S. equities.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about systematic investing
- What does portfolio concentration mean, and why does it matter?
Portfolio concentration refers to how much a strategy invests in a limited number of stocks, sectors, or regions. More concentrated portfolios may deliver higher return potential if investment ideas perform well, but they can also experience greater volatility and risk if those positions underperform. Less concentrated, more diversified portfolios tend to spread risk across a broader set of holdings but may limit the impact of individual winners.
- How does systematic investing work?
Systematic investing uses quantitative models and research to evaluate thousands of stocks consistently. At Allspring, these models are combined with fundamental perspectives that aim to identify attractively priced companies, avoid unintended risks, and adapt to changing market conditions.
- How do actively managed funds differ from index funds?
Active funds seek to outperform a benchmark through research‑driven security selection, portfolio positioning, and risk management. Index funds, by contrast, aim to replicate a benchmark’s composition and performance, with portfolio weights fixed to the index.
- What makes Allspring’s Systematic Core Equity approach different?
Allspring takes a dual approach, meaning quantitative tools are paired with real‑world investment experience. Rather than relying on a single factor or signal, the strategy incorporates:
- Multiple investment factors
- Dynamic models that evolve with markets
- Active risk management across sectors and styles
This strategy seeks to create portfolios that are disciplined, transparent, and intuitive for investors. Learn more about Allspring’s systematic core investment approach.
- Who is the Systematic Core Equity team?
Allspring’s Systematic Core Equity team is a dedicated group of portfolio managers, quantitative researchers, and investment professionals with decades of experience. Team members are deeply involved in both research and portfolio construction, ensuring accountability and consistency across strategies.
- How does the team manage risk?
Risk management is central to the strategy. Allspring’s Systematic Core Equity team evaluates portfolios from multiple perspectives, including:
- Stock‑specific risk
- Factor and style exposures
- Sector and market risk
This multidimensional approach aims to limit unintended bets and improve portfolio resilience across market cycles.
