Built to Be Beaten: The Fixed Income Active Management Edge
Evidence shows that active fixed income managers have, on average, exploited persistent market inefficiencies, delivering risk adjusted alpha and exhibiting skill persistence, especially in broader, global, and credit-oriented mandates.
Explore Full PDF
Key takeaways
- We identify nine sources of fixed income inefficiencies we believe lead to persistent opportunities for skilled active managers to generate alpha.
- This research shows most active managers have delivered positive, risk-adjusted outperformance and maintained strong information ratios over time.
- Evidence exists for performance persistence: top managers often remain top performers, especially in broader, global, and credit intensive mandates.
Executive summary
Generating alpha through bond market inefficiencies
Global fixed income markets and benchmarks contain several inefficiencies that active fund managers have uncovered and used to deliver meaningful alpha. We can observe this across widely disparate universes of active managers and over extended periods of time. We present nine distinct sources of inefficiencies across three primary categories: investor and market composition, benchmark construction, and practical complexity.
Navigating inefficiencies to generate fixed income alpha
Market segmentation and persistent home bias create supply and demand imbalances, while central bank interventions further distort valuations. Passive strategies mechanically absorb these pricing anomalies, whereas active managers capitalize on relative value discrepancies.
Traditional benchmarks rely heavily on ratings agencies, which often lag in reflecting real-time credit deterioration. Added to this, capitalization weighting forces passive investors to allocate disproportionate capital to the most heavily indebted issuers, often without offering commensurate yield. Traditional indexes also delay the inclusion of newly issued securities, causing investors to miss the often beneficial new-issue concession. Active managers bypass these structural constraints by allocating capital based on independent credit fundamentals, relative value, and primary market participation.
The asymmetric return profile of credit investing has rewarded rigorous downside risk mitigation to avoid harmful credit events, a capability that passive strategies inherently lack. Furthermore, market complexity and limited liquidity make full index replication impractical, leading to tracking error and implementation shortfall for passive funds.
Empirical evidence of active management superiority
Empirical data strongly supports the superiority of active management in this space. Institutional investors observing rolling five-year periods will note that a majority of active managers have generated positive Jensen’s alpha and favorable information ratios. Crucially, this active skill has persisted over time. Top-quartile managers demonstrated a pronounced ability to both generate alpha and maintain their superior ranking in subsequent periods. Ultimately, institutional investors seeking to maximize alpha and navigate market inefficiencies should recognize that active management has remained a durable and rewarding strategy within fixed income portfolios.
Related insights
George Bory, chief investment strategist for Allspring Fixed Income, explains how active bond investing can enhance outcomes by focusing on investor needs, weighing opportunity costs, and capitalizing on market inefficiencies.
Janet Rilling reviews the dynamic market shifts of Q1, strategies for navigating Q2, and her team’s disciplined approach to managing through volatility.
George Bory and Jamie Newton discuss global credit markets amid rising dispersion, structural shifts, and AI-driven investing, urging fixed income investors to consider active strategies with global diversification and sector selectivity.
George Bory explains why bond markets in 2026 should favor discipline and flexibility. Positive real yields, global policy divergence, and credit dispersion may create opportunities for income generation and selective positioning.
Janet Rilling and Hannah Rosencrantz give a Q3 fixed income market update—discussing strong bond performance, potential risks in credit compensation, and strategies for building resilient portfolios in Q4.
Fixed income benchmark construction has two fundamental flaws. First, exposures prioritize the needs of borrowers rather than investors. Second, this tends to expose investors to the biggest risks at the worst times.
Two of Allspring’s senior portfolio managers and high yield specialists, Chris Lee and Mike Schueller, sit down with Daniel Sarnowski to discuss recent volatility and why focusing on shorter-duration, higher-quality high yield assets could be the answer in uncertain markets.
Nick Venditti, head of Municipal Fixed Income at Allspring Global Investments, talks about how, for the first time in a while, the higher education sector is starting to show signs of distress.
All investing involves risks, including the possible loss of principal. There can be no assurance that any investment strategy will be successful. Investments fluctuate with changes in market and economic conditions and in different environments due to numerous factors, some of which may be unpredictable. Each asset class has its own risk and return characteristics.
This material is provided for informational purposes only and is intended for professional/institutional investor and qualified client use only. Not for retail public use.
ALL-05152026-hftbtpzt
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.