Article

Macro Matters: Markets Move Post-U.S. Midterms

Which macroeconomic trends do we think matter the most? Read through the investment implications in this month’s issue of Macro Matters.

A graphic showing blue and purple light streaks forming a radiating pattern.

11/6/2026

7 min read


Topic

Market Events

Key takeaways

Growth: Growth remains resilient but is losing momentum. The U.S. continues to outperform, supported by fiscal spending and artificial intelligence (AI)-related investment. However, this impact is fading, and the growth boost from the AI buildout is expected to peak around late 2026 or early 2027. The U.S. midterm election results could also reshape the growth outlook. Developed markets face weaker underlying growth and labor market conditions, while China remains the outlier, pursuing countercyclical easing amid persistent deflationary pressures.

Inflation: Inflation is reaccelerating, but pressures remain predominantly supply-driven. Favorable base effects should provide some cushion through the first half of 2027, although higher energy prices represent an important upside risk. Potential tariff relief following the U.S. midterm elections increases uncertainty around fiscal and regulatory policy. This leaves central banks balancing weaker activity against inflation that may stay above target for longer.

Rates: The consequences of large fiscal deficits, coupled with AI-linked borrowing and central bank hikes, are starting to increasingly push longer-term interest rates higher. However, the U.S. midterm results could tilt the balance of fiscal spending away from tax benefits toward other sectors. With growth losing momentum and financial conditions already restrictive, we believe the current market pricing for rates is particularly vulnerable to a re-rating. Ultimately, we believe central banks should deliver fewer hikes than markets are currently pricing.

Geopolitics: Geopolitics remain one of the most important drivers of markets. Beyond the immediate impact of conflicts, geopolitical developments continue to shape commodity prices, market expectations, supply chain decisions, and fiscal spending priorities. In the U.S., the midterm election results introduce another policy variable, with potential implications for fiscal policy, AI investment, health care, financials, tariffs, and housing.

Recent market moves

In our view, the recent sell-off in U.S. equities was as much about an exceptionally poor technical setup and forced re-hedging by market participants as it was about a deterioration in fundamentals. The near-term tail risks remain elevated, with more positioning to work through. However, the Democratic sweep changes the distribution of policy risks and may drive sentiment.

The massive investment in AI and the return on that investment have been under scrutiny for months at this point. The fundamentals argue for greater scrutiny of large technology platforms, data centers, and infrastructure supporting AI, particularly around power consumption, permitting, data use, and local infrastructure. This could slow the buildout and add regulatory or tax burdens, but we believe it is unlikely to stop it entirely. The relatively large market moves in recent days appear to be more technically driven at this stage. Typical proxies and broader parts of the equity market have been relatively resilient, and neither suggests that the recent moves are indicative of a broader "growth scare" or "inflation scare."

We believe it is becoming increasingly clear that market participants had reduced hedges following the midterms, only to reestablish them yesterday, helping drive these moves. Thursday saw the highest put option volume in history, with “Tariff Day” (April 4, 2025) a close second. While the technical backdrop matters tremendously in the short term, we argue for patience over a longer horizon. Excess liquidity has been shrinking on both the fiscal and monetary sides; the yield curve has flattened, and financial conditions have tightened over 2026. In the same vein, positioning in the AI theme has been crowded, and we have not yet seen the kind of broad capitulation that would normally give us greater confidence that the unwind is complete.

Our economic outlook

In our view, the global economy is showing increasing signs of being late in the economic cycle. In the U.S., growth remains above trend but is gradually losing momentum, with a softer labor market evident in weaker participation, volatile payrolls, and slowing wage growth. Inflation is beginning to reaccelerate, largely reflecting supply-side pressures, although favorable base effects should provide some cushion through the first half of 2027. At the same time, financial conditions remain restrictive, with large fiscal deficits, AI-related capital spending, and tighter monetary policy keeping sustained pressure on longer-term interest rates. The AI investment cycle remains an important support for activity, but its contribution to growth is likely to peak in late 2026 or early 2027.

The U.S. midterm elections shifted control of both chambers of Congress, resulting in a divided government beginning in January. This adds another dimension to our outlook. We expect to see a higher level of scrutiny of capital expenditure depreciation, tariffs, and defense spending. Higher taxes appear unlikely in the near term, though Democrats may begin laying the groundwork for potential changes in 2028. A narrower fiscal deficit could be supportive for bond investors.

The election results could also reshape the investment and sector backdrop. Critical examination of AI investment incentives and data center development could raise costs and slow the pace of the AI buildout while potentially improving capital discipline and credit profiles among hyperscalers and other AI providers. Health care and financials may face greater policy scrutiny, while consumer-oriented sectors could benefit from potential tariff relief. Taken together, these shifts reinforce the case for greater selectivity across markets as investors assess the implications of a changing fiscal, regulatory, and monetary policy environment.

Elsewhere, other developed economies face a similar but more challenging mix of weaker growth, softer labor markets, and persistent inflation pressures, without the same degree of growth support that the U.S. has benefited from. Geopolitical risk remains prominent across the major economies, with higher energy prices representing the primary transmission channel to inflation, growth, and ultimately monetary policy. China remains the notable exception, with policymakers pursuing countercyclical easing in response to persistent deflationary pressures. All together, we see a global economy that is slowing rather than contracting, but with narrowing sources of growth and less room for policy error. We believe that despite near-term inflation risks, softer activity and restrictive financial conditions should ultimately allow central banks to deliver fewer hikes than markets currently price.

Prospective changes to asset allocation

  • Equities
    We maintain a neutral view on equities, balancing resilient earnings against a more uncertain macroeconomic and geopolitical backdrop. Elevated real yields remain a consideration, while expectations around the AI investment cycle continue to influence the broader technology sector. Investor attention is increasingly shifting from the scale of AI-related capital expenditure to the returns generated by that investment, including its contribution to revenues, margins, and earnings per share. This suggests expectations are becoming more demanding, even as the underlying investment cycle remains robust.
  • Fixed income
    We remain neutral overall on fixed income but see greater relative value opportunities within the asset class. We have used recent spread widening to add selectively to high yield, funded from investment-grade credit and sovereign bonds. Within sovereigns, we remain neutral on overall duration, preferring to express views through cross-country positioning. Global real yields remain attractive, but persistent inflation pressures and diverging growth trajectories argue for greater selectivity. We are favoring sovereign debt from Japan, Australia, and Canada, albeit for different reasons. Japan is supported primarily by technical factors, despite the country’s normalizing monetary policy. In Australia, the rate-hiking cycle is more advanced and the outlook is increasingly driven by growth. In Canada, softer growth and comparatively contained inflation pressures provide a different source of opportunity.
  • Commodities and foreign exchange
    We remain neutral on commodities while broadening our opportunity set within the asset class. In energy, persistent geopolitical uncertainty leads us to favor relative value opportunities over outright directional exposure. We also favor industrial metals and retain a modest overweight to agricultural commodities, despite some softening in underlying fundamentals. Within currencies, we remain positive on select economies where favorable growth dynamics, orthodox monetary policy, and attractive starting rates provide support.

Multi-asset allocation views

These multi-asset views reflect tilts to our strategic asset allocation models and are based on a 6- to 12-month time horizon, driven by both quantitative and fundamental research.
+ (Overweight on overall asset class)    
= (Neutral on overall asset class)  
– (Underweight on overall asset class)

Primary asset class allocations relative to individual targeted
neutral portfolios

Overweight/neutral/underweight

Global equities

Overall

 =   

U.S. large cap

   Neutral

 

U.S. mid cap

   Neutral

U.S. small cap

   Neutral

Eurozone

   Neutral

Japan

   Neutral  

U.K.

   Neutral

EM

   Neutral

Global rates*

Overall

 =

U.S. government-related

   Underweight

U.S. inflation-linked

   Overweight

Eurozone

   Underweight

Japan

   Overweight

U.K.

   Neutral

Australia

   Overweight

Canada

   Overweight

Global credit

Overall

 =  

Global investment grade

   Underweight

Global high yield

   Overweight

EM debt

   Overweight

Currencies

Overall

 =

USD

   Overweight

CHF

   Underweight

JPY

   Neutral

EUR

   Underweight

EM

   Overweight

Commodities

Overall

 =  

Oil

   Overweight

Precious metals

   Underweight

Industrial metals

   Overweight


For illustrative purposes only. Source: Allspring Multi-Asset Team, as of 06-Nov-26. Based on the team’s analysis of current data and trends for each category of assets. Weights are based on client-specific asset allocation target and may vary based upon defined specific neutral allocation weightings. *For global rates, an overweight tilt relative to individual targeted neutral portfolio views, indicates a broad expectation for lower rates in the asset class or underlying sectors. Conversely, a relative underweight tilt would indicate a broad expectation for rising rates, respectively.

Forward investment implications

Equities
Sector-specific commentary
Overall: We favor combining higher-quality companies with areas where investor sentiment is improving, as real yields continue to act as a headwind for risk appetite.
EM We remain selectively positive in technology-sensitive areas.
Eurozone We have a neutral view on the eurozone equity market.
Japan We are beginning to shift exposure toward sectors in Japan that are less sensitive to growth factors.
U.S. We prefer broad-based U.S. equity exposure.
Fixed income
Sector-specific commentary
Overall: We remain cautious on the long end of interest rate curves in the U.S. while favoring pockets of sovereign debt in other developed markets.
U.S. We prefer the intermediate part of the curve, which should be less sensitive to growth and inflation revisions, but we continue to favor remaining underweight to the long end.
Eurozone Eurozone bonds have a headwind from overly hawkish monetary policy guidance in our view, particularly at the front of the curve.
Japan We added an overweight stance on Japanese government bonds.
EM We continue to favor EM debt over the medium term, supported by a significant carry cushion and orthodox monetary policy. 
Currencies (FX) Sector-specific commentary
USD We continue to favor the U.S. dollar as a potential portfolio diversifier, as it looks attractive relative to select developed markets.
EUR Despite the repricing of interest rates with rate-hike expectations, we expect the euro to be under pressure from very low growth.
EM We remain selectively positive on high-growth, low-inflation emerging market currencies.
Commodities Sector-specific commentary
Oil We continue to manage our views on energy exposure fluidly, having moved from favoring directional positioning to preferring relative value exposures. 
Precious metals We continue to tactically manage our viewpoint on this exposure over time.
Industrial metals We continue to favor managing this exposure tactically. We have a positive view over the medium term, but we see near-term headwinds for metals. 
Agriculture We remain positive on agricultural commodities, albeit with several idiosyncratic risks on the horizon. 

Common questions about asset allocation and macroeconomic insights from Allspring

Why is asset allocation so important for long-term investors?

We believe asset allocation is one of the primary drivers of long-term investment outcomes for both advisors and investors. From our perspective, it determines how portfolios balance growth potential with risk management across different economic environments. We believe a well-constructed asset allocation anchors portfolios through cycles of growth, inflation, tightening, and recession, helping investors stay invested and aligned with their objectives. Connect with us to see if our insights align with your goals.

How does macroeconomic analysis influence asset allocation decisions?

Our monthly Macro Matters commentary focuses on identifying which economic forces are influencing markets most at a given point in the cycle, such as growth momentum, inflation dynamics, monetary policy, and geopolitics. These factors shape relative opportunities and risks across asset classes. We use macro analysis to frame what we believe are plausible investment implications and provide multi-asset allocation views on risk/reward characteristics for strategic asset allocation. Contact our team to discuss what these views may mean for your portfolio.

Should investors change their asset allocation frequently based on the news?

In our view, asset allocation should evolve but not react impulsively. We differentiate between strategic asset allocation, which reflects long-term goals and constraints, and tactical moves, which may reflect shorter-term macroeconomics and market conditions. We believe our monthly commentary helps investors understand why small, incremental adjustments may be appropriate at times while avoiding the pitfalls of chasing headlines or trying to time markets.

How do rising or falling interest rates affect asset allocation?

Interest rate environments matter greatly for both equities and fixed income. When rates are rising, duration exposure, equity valuations, and sector leadership can all shift. When rates stabilize or fall, different opportunities emerge. Our commentary is driven by both quantitative and fundamental research to emphasize understanding the drivers behind rate moves, whether inflation pressures, changing growth expectations, or policy shifts, and adjusting allocations accordingly rather than relying on simple rules of thumb.

What role can non-domestic assets play in portfolio allocation?

Global asset allocation may expand an investor’s opportunity set and help manage macro risks that are country-specific. Differences in economic cycles, central bank behavior, fiscal policy, and valuation can create meaningful dispersion across regions. While global investing may introduce additional risks, such as currency and political considerations, we believe these risks can be thoughtfully incorporated into diversified portfolios over time.

How can investors approach asset allocation during periods of heightened uncertainty?

Periods of uncertainty often feel like the most difficult time to make asset allocation decisions, but they are also when discipline may matter most. Our perspective is to focus on fundamentals, valuations, and medium-term trends rather than short-term volatility. Monthly macroeconomic updates are designed to help investors put uncertainty in context, separate signal from noise, and avoid emotionally driven allocation changes.

What is the goal of Allspring’s monthly macro commentary for investors?

The goal is not to predict markets with precision, but to provide a decision-making framework. Our commentary aims to help investors understand how evolving macroeconomic conditions may affect asset class behavior and portfolio construction. By connecting economic trends to practical asset allocation implications, we seek to support more informed, consistent, and long-term-oriented investment decisions.

Carry refers to the net return earned from holding an asset over time, independent of price movements, after accounting for the costs of financing or maintaining that position.

Curve steepener refers to a change in the yield curve where the difference between long-term interest rates and short-term interest rates increases, making the yield curve steeper.

Duration is a measurement of the sensitivity of a bond’s price to changes in Treasury yields. A fund’s duration is the weighted average of duration of the bonds in the portfolio. Duration should be interpreted as the approximate change in a bond’s (or fund’s) price for a 100-basis-point change in Treasury yields. Duration is based on historical performance and does not represent future results.

Hedging a security means using a separate investment to offset the potential risks of that given security.

Hyperscalers are large tech companies that provide cloud-computing infrastructure to the AI labs.

The Nikkei Stock Average (Nikkei 225) is composed of 225 stocks selected from domestic common stocks in the first section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange and is a leading benchmark for Japanese equities.

The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index reflects changes in the prices of goods and services purchased by consumers in the U.S. It is part of the Personal Income and Outlays Report issued by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) is an economic indicator that measures the health of a country’s manufacturing or services sector.

A put option is an options contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to sell an asset at a specified price within a specified period.

Real yield can be defined as the nominal yield that is received from an investment after accounting for the 

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Diversification does not ensure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses.

This material is provided for informational purposes only and is intended for retail public distribution in the United States. Use outside the United States is for professional/qualified investors only.

ALL-11042026-81gtrepx